**Contents**

- What Is Gamma?
- Key Points Regarding Gamma
- How Gamma Works – Relationship With Delta
- How Gamma Works – Relationship With Vega
- Gamma And Option Strategies
- Gamma Risk Explained
- Iron Condor Gamma Risk – Comparing Weekly And Monthly Condors
- Butterfly Gamma Risk – Comparing Weekly And Monthly Butterflies
- Gamma Scalping
- IBM Gamma Scalp Using Long Straddle
- The Cost Of Scalping – Theta Decay
- Bringing It All Together – Gamma Scalping, Market Makers And Implied Volatility
- Gamma-Delta Neutral Trading

**What Is Gamma?**

Gamma is the ugly step child of option greeks.

You know, the one that gets left in the corner and no one pays any attention to it?

The problem is, that step child is going to cause you some real headaches unless you give it the attention it deserves and take the time to understand it.

Gamma is the driving force behind changes in an options delta.

It represents the rate of change of an option’s delta.

An option with a gamma of +0.05 will see its delta increase by 0.05 for every 1 point move in the underlying.

Likewise, an option with a gamma of -0.05 will see its delta decrease by 0.05 for every 1 point move in the underlying.

**Key Points Regarding Gamma**

Gamma will be higher for shorter dated options.

For this reason, the last week of an options life is referred to as “gamma week”.

Most professional traders do not want to be short gamma during the last week of an options life.

Gamma is at its highest with at-the-money options.

Net sellers of options will be short gamma and net buyers of options will be long gamma.

This makes sense because most sellers of options do not want the stock to move far, while buyers of options benefit from large movements.

A larger gamma (positive or negative) leads to a larger change in delta when your stock moves.

Low gamma positions display a flatter risk graph, reflecting less fluctuation in P&L.

High-gamma positions display a steeper risk graph, reflecting high fluctuation in P&L.

Get Your Free Standard Deviation Calculator

**How Gamma Works – Relationship With Delta**

To get an idea of how gamma and delta work together, we will compare an at-the-money and an out-of-the-money call option.

In the picture below you can see that a 10 lot at-the-money call position has a positive delta of 524 and a gamma of positive 62.

The 185 call position has a delta of 86 and a gamma of 29. The gamma for the at-the-money position is significantly higher.

On the right side of the picture is a custom scenario.

Assuming SPY has risen by 1% and all other factors remain the same (volatility, time to expiry, dividends).

The delta for the 177 calls has risen by 107 to 631 whereas the 185 calls have only risen by 65 (Note that on a percentage basis the 185 calls had a bigger rise, but in terms of actual delta exposure, the 177’s had a bigger increase).

We can do the same analysis using long calls with different expiry months. Here you can see that the Dec 177 calls have a delta of 525 and a gamma of 63.

The June, 2014 177 calls have a similar delta at 501, but a much lower gamma at 21.

Again, assuming a 1% change in price, you can see that the Dec calls have picked up an extra 107 delta and the June calls have only picked up an extra 38 delta.

The above analysis confirms that **at-the-money options have higher gamma risk than out-of-the-money options** and **shorter dated options have higher gamma risk than longer dated options**.

**How Gamma Works – Relationship With Vega**

The gamma of an option will also be affected by Vega.

When implied volatility on a stock is low, the gamma of at-the-money options will be high, while the gamma of deep out-of-the-money options will be near zero.

This is because, when volatility is low, deep out-of-the-money options will have very little value as the time premium is so low.

However, option prices rise dramatically on a relative basis, as you move back along the option chain towards the at-the-money strikes.

When volatility is high, and option prices are higher across the board, gamma tends to be more stable across the option strike prices.

When volatility is high, the time value embedded in the deep out-of-the-money options can be quite high.

Therefore as you move from the outer strikes back towards the at-the-money strikes, the increase in time value is less dramatic.

This concept is probably best explained visually.

In the table below you can see the gamma of SPY calls when volatility is low (VIX at 12.50) and high (VIX at 25.00).

The variation in gamma across the strikes is much smoother when volatility is high.

Therefore, you can assume that **the gamma risk of at-the-money options is much higher when volatility is low**.

Here is the same data represented graphically. You can see when implied volatility is low, the gamma risk is much higher for the at-the-money strikes.

**Gamma And Option Strategies**

So far we have only looked at individual options strikes.

However, every option combination strategy will also have a gamma exposure.

Trades that require you to be a net seller of options, such as iron condors, will have negative gamma, and strategies where you are a net buyer of options will have positive gamma. Below are some of the main options strategies and their gamma exposure:

**Gamma Risk Explained**

In order to better illustrate how gamma works,

I’ll look at a couple of different scenarios and compare how they are affected by a -2.0% move in price, with all other factors staying the same.

I’ll look at their initial delta and their new delta after the move.

**Iron Condor Gamma Risk – Comparing Weekly And Monthly Condors**

First up we have two iron condors with the short strikes set at delta 10. The weekly condor has a -4 gamma which is twice as high as the monthly condor at -2.

After a -2.0% move in the underlying, the weekly condors gamma has switched to positive and exploded out to 62, while the monthly delta has only moved to 20.

Clearly, the weekly condor has a much higher gamma risk.

**This is part of the reason why I do not like to trade weekly condors. **

**A small move in the underlying can have a major impact on your position**.

**Butterfly Gamma Risk – Comparing Weekly And Monthly Butterflies**

Next we will look at butterfly spreads comparing weekly, monthly, narrow and wide butterflies.

Comparing a weekly and monthly 10 point butterfly, we have an interesting situation, with both trades basically having zero gamma at initiation.

This is due to the fact that the short strikes were exactly at-the-money with RUT trading at 1101 at the time.

In any case, we see that with a -2.0% move in RUT, the weekly delta moves from -20 to +3 for a move of 23 points.

The monthly delta moves from -4 to +3 for a total move of only 7 points.

Finally, let’s look at a 50 point wide at-the-money butterfly.

The weekly butterfly has a whopping 146 point change in delta!

The monthly butterfly moves 73 points.

We can deduce from the above that weekly trades have a much higher gamma risk.

Butterflies have a higher gamma risk than iron condors and wide butterflies have the highest gamma risk of all the strategies. This is summarized below:

**Gamma Scalping**

Now that we know a bit more about gamma risk, let’s investigate a strategy you may have heard of called gamma scalping.

Gamma scalping is like that hot girl from high school that you were never good enough for.

The more you find out about her, the more amazing she sounds, but you don’t really know what makes her tick.

Gamma scalping is not for everyone for a number of reasons.

For starters you have to be pretty well capitalized as it can be very capital intensive.

Secondly, you need to have a very good understanding of how option greeks work before you even think about trading this way.

Many market makers make their livelihood by gamma scalping, so retail traders are naturally curious about this strategy, so that they can “trade like the pros”.

The gamma scalping performed by market makers is an essential component of the efficient functioning of options markets as you will soon learn.

There are a few different ways you can set up a gamma scalp, but let’s look at an example using a long straddle.

**IBM Gamma Scalp Using Long Straddle**

**Date:** November 1, 2013

**Current Price:** $179.42

**Trade Set Up: **

Buy 2 IBM Jan 17^{th} 2014, 180 calls @ $4.35

Buy 2 IBM Jan 17^{th} 2014, 180 puts @ $5.65

**Premium:** $2,000 Net Debit

This trade set up gave us a net delta exposure of -13, so to get to delta neutral, we buy 13 shares.

**Trade Set Up: **

Buy 13 IBM shares @ $179.42

**Cost:** $2,332.46 Net Debit

**Total Cost: **$4,332.46

This trade will start out with a delta of zero, but it won’t stay that way.

The reason is because of the positive gamma associated with the trade.

In this case, the trade has a beginning gamma of +13. As the price of IBM fluctuates, the delta will change because of the gamma exposure.

Being a positive gamma trade, price moves will benefit the trade. As IBM moves up, it will gain positive delta, as IBM moves down, the trade will pick up negative delta.

In order to get back to delta neutral each time, we would need to either buy or sell IBM shares.

As the stock moves down, we gain negative delta and need to buy shares (buy low). As the stock moves up we sell shares (sell high) to neutralize delta.

Notice that we are buying low and selling high.

These transactions in the stock generate cash flow and can give rise to a profit providing the straddle does not lose too much value.

**The Cost Of Scalping – Theta Decay**

If the above sounds too good to be true, well it is, there is a catch in the form of theta decay.

We know that long options decay as time passes and this is the issue traders face with gamma scalping.

The long calls and puts that make up the straddle will decay by a certain amount each day.

If the stock does not move up and down enough, the time decay on the straddle will be greater than the profits from the stock trades.

**When gamma scalping, you want a stock that moves a lot during the course of the trade**.

Option greeks work together rather than in isolation. Theta and vega have a distinct relationship.

If implied volatility is high, the time value embedded in options will be high.

Therefore, options with high implied volatility will have a higher rate of theta decay.

It makes sense that it will be harder to gamma scalp on a stock with high implied volatility, as the stock will need to move much more in order to offset the losses from time decay.

It also makes sense that a good time to gamma scalp is when the implied volatility of a stock is at the lower end of it’s 12 month range as the options you are buying will be cheaper and you will need less movement in the stock to cover the theta decay.

**Bringing It All Together – Gamma Scalping, Market Makers And Implied Volatility**

Dan Passarelli write a very good article on TheStreet.com which I will quote from here:

*Market makers (exchange members who provide liquidity) are major players in the gamma-scalping arena. As they take the other side of public trades, they hedge the deltas and subsequently scalp gamma of long option positions.*

When market makers find they cannot cover their theta by gamma scalping because the underlying stock is not experiencing enough actual price oscillation, they are incented to try and sell their options to get out of the losing trade. They lower their bids and offers some to try and attract buyers. If that doesn’t work, they lower them more. All the while, this lowers the options’ implied volatility.

When market makers find they cannot cover their theta by gamma scalping because the underlying stock is not experiencing enough actual price oscillation, they are incented to try and sell their options to get out of the losing trade. They lower their bids and offers some to try and attract buyers. If that doesn’t work, they lower them more. All the while, this lowers the options’ implied volatility.

In a way, the gamma scalping of market makers links together implied and historical volatility. If the stock isn’t moving enough (i.e., historical volatility is too low) for market makers to cover theta, they lower their markets (i.e., they lower implied volatility).

In a way, the gamma scalping of market makers links together implied and historical volatility. If the stock isn’t moving enough (i.e., historical volatility is too low) for market makers to cover theta, they lower their markets (i.e., they lower implied volatility).

Even though you may not be willing or able to engage in gamma scalping, hopefully you now have a little bit more of an understanding of how the options markets works and how the different players all fit together.

**Gamma-Delta Neutral Trading**

Now that we know a bit about gamma scalping and delta neutral trades, the next step would be to learn about neutralizing both delta **and** gamma.

I won’t go into details here as while the theory behind the idea is sound, I’m not convince this would work in practice.

If you’re interested in reading an excellent article on the topic, you can do so here.

This article addresses one of the most important aspects of options trading: the constant tussle between theta and gamma. You rightly identified the gamma risk as the slope of the P/L graph. Overall, a good article.

Thanks Option Oz!

u both want a lower IV environment to reduce time decay and hope a volatile move? they can’t happen together…

Hi AJ,

Are you referring to the section on gamma scalping? If so, you want higher vol as that will increase the value of your long options.

Excellent article! One thing I thought of to mention though. Like you said the shorter-term condors have higher gamma risk. But there’s always a flip-side. Don’t the longer-term condors have higher vega risk than their shorter-term counterparts? So aren’t you just trading one risk(gamma) for another risk(vega) when you switch from a weekly condor to a monthly condor?

Hi Rob,

Yes you’re pretty much spot on there. I will do a post about it.

Thanks,

Gav.

Hi, Gav

Thanks for your explanation on the gamma! This post is great!

Do you write the new post about the weekly iron condor with gamma / vega risk?

Thanks for the kind words. Try this post:

https://optionstradingiq.com/weekly-v-monthly-iron-condors/